To:

F. C. C.
Washington, DC 20003
Email: fccinfo@fcc.gov

From:

Plinio Designori

New Ruskin College .com

www.NewRuskinCollege.com

email:  PlinioDesignori@NewRuskinCollege.com

Subject:

KQED, KGO, KSFO, KCBS, KNEW, ABC Network, PBS, Viacom, Michael Weiner aka Savage,  Don Imus, Ron Owens, Mrs. Jack Swanson, and Michael Krasney

"I would encourage the FCC to take a very hard look at whether something that is this pervasive, something that is so corrosive to the integrity of the market place should not merely be investigated and pursued, but whether some of these stations deserve to have their licenses stripped," said Spitzer at the downtown Manhattan press conference trumpeting the settlement. "They know what the law is and they have been disregarding it willfully and pervasively."

The FCC appears to be paying close attention.

 ---- Billboard Radio Monitor   (http://www.billboardradiomonitor.com/radiomonitor/news/business/leg_reg/article_display.jsp?vnu_content_id=1000991291)

I have been the target of the above referenced people for the last fifteen years.  I set up a web site, www.NewRuskinCollege.com, to tell my story about how these rich powerful people have used their power, including their radio broadcasts,  to oppress me over these years.

I came to their attention after conducting a letter writing campaign to the U. S. Senate about the importance of laser disks, computer aided instruction, in education.  Out of envy or spite these  people then began a program of harassment against me including using their radio broadcasts to let me know how they had interfered with my employment, or had me followed, etc..  Please visit my web site for the details.

I had hoped that those who have knowledge about what has been done to me would come forward and give evidence.  No one ever came forward.

They have ruined me and driven me to my death.  In a few days I will kill myself in front of the KQED building to protest them.

I ask that the FCC take away their broadcast licenses for their use of their broadcasts to harasse and oppress me. 

Date:  07-26-05

To:

Council on American-Islamic Relations
453 New Jersey Avenue, S.E.
Washington, DC 20003

Tel: 202-488-8787
Fax: 202-488-0833
Email: cair@cair-net.org

From:

Plinio Designori

New Ruskin College .com

www.NewRuskinCollege.com

email:  PlinioDesignori@NewRuskinCollege.com

Subject:

KSFO radio station San Francisco, Michael Weiner aka Savage, and Don Imus

I have been listening to the above condemn Islam for violence even as they advocate nuclear genocide and “bombing them back into the stone age.”

To say that they are hypocrites is an understatement.  Yesterday Michael Weiner advocated “random acts of terror” against Islamic nations.  He said we should destroy whole ports, anonymously, i.e. without taking responsibility.  Then not a minute latter he condemned someone else for suggesting that a terror attack might have been conducted by some state anonymously, i.e. exactly as he had himself just advocated!

But this is nothing new, they all have repeatedly advocated wholesale slaughter, genocide.  As you know already they are vicious horrible people. 

I have had my own problems with these people over the last fifteen years.  I set up a web site, www.NewRuskinCollege.com, to tell my story about how these rich powerful people have oppressed me over these years.

I thought you might be interested in learning how they have oppressed me.  Basically I came to their attention after conducting a letter writing campaign to the U. S. Senate about the importance of laser disks, computer aided instruction, in education.  Out of envy or spite these very same people who are defaming you,  then began a program of harassment against me.  Please visit my web site for the details.

They have ruined me and driven me to my death.  I hope the information at the web site will help you.  I wish you the best of luck.

Date:  07-11-05

To:    Dr. Howard Allen Pearson

          Professor Emeritus Pediatrics

          Yale University   

           howard.pearson@yale.edu

From:  Plinio Designori, Magistor

             www.NewRuskinCollege.com

             PlinioDesignori@NewRuskinCollege.com

Re.   Imus Watch:  07-11-05

Dear Dr. Howard Allen Pearson;

You do not know me but for a number of years I have been targeted by Don Imus.  Whenever I read how Don
Imus has hurt someone else I write to them and offer what information I have about Don Imus in the hopes that his other victims will benefit from knowledge about my experience.

Therefore, I invite you to visit my web site, www.NewRuskinCollege.com , where I have described how Imus has harassed and oppressed me for these many years.   

My troubles began when I inadvertently came to the attention of Don Imus and a number of other figures in the mass media.  Starting in 1988 I wrote some letters to the U. S. Senate about the importance of technology in education.  (These letters are available for review at my web site just follow the links to the Math Project Archives and the New Ruskin College Project Archives which are located in the Moynihan Memorial Library @NewRuskinCollege.com.) 

My letter writing campaign was a success only in the sense that I did manage to attract public notice.  Unfortunately not for or in the way I had intended.  Rather than focusing on the use of laser disk technology in education many people, including Don Imus, focused their attention on me.  On me as an individual.

I will not here bore you with the details but is suffices to say that over the following fifteen years, even though I stopped my letter writing campaign, years ago, these people, including Don Imus, have followed me from place to place, job to job, harassing me, oppressing me, in short they have driven me to ruin and despair.

In 2003 I set up my web site in the hopes that they would leave me alone.  They have not. 

My hope was that by making their actions public people would come forward and testify against them.  No one ever came forward.  I am all alone.

I wish you good luck with your law suit against Don Imus.  

Date:  07-08-05

To:  Senator Voinovich                                    

        U. S. Senate

        Washington, D.C.            

Note:    This is your copy.

            Please send Senator Voinovich

a copy his email is not working.

From:  Plinio Designori                                     

            Magistor

            www.NewRuskinCollege.com

Subject:  I protest Voinovichism

“I have heard what you do to some of your listeners.”

---  Senator Hatch, on the Don Imus radio show.

Dear Senator Voinovich;

Mr. Bolton has given years of his life to the service of this country.  Have you ever asked yourself why he spent his time in public service?   Do you think he was in it for the money?  Do you not think he has made sacrifices for  this country?

Why did he spend so much time for us?  Do you suppose it was for a bigger bank account?  A bigger home?  How many minutes of YOUR time did you spare him?

After hearing how he “chased” a woman through the lobby of a Moscow hotel you said, “I have heard enough.”  That was twenty minutes of histrionics by Senator Dodd, (who received more contributions from accountants than any other member of the Congress), and you said you had heard enough.

One question.  Why did he have to “chase.”  Why didn’t the woman, the USAID bureaucrat, stand and talk to Mr. Bolton, as we say ‘man to man?’

Why indeed was he reduced to putting notes under the door of her hotel room?  And note that this, just putting written notes under her door, this has been cited as another “offense.”

How about this:  Because the woman was a VICTIM.   VICTIMS are not expected to stand and answer questions, make arguments, defend their reasons and positions.  Why even to expect them to is itself just another imposition and domination.   

And further, because the Democrats know that they can count on Voinovich to see her as the VICTIM, they used it to destroy the career of a man who has faithfully served his country for these many years. 

The fact that the woman VICTIM is herself a Democrat operative, founder of Housewives  against Bush, (note: not FOR Kerry), does in no way diminish her standing as a VICTIM.  For it is the controversy itself, the mere fact that she alleges being “chased” (because she would not stand and talk, man to man), the mere fact of controversy, is enough to sink Mr. Bolton’s career.

This is Voinovichism.

For the longest time for over a decade I held on to hope that as more people learned about what Michael Weiner and Don Imus and Mrs. Jack Swanson and Ron Owens and Michael Krasney and Sedge Thomson had done to me, were doing to me, are still doing, I held on to hope that finally, some day justice would be done. 

But I did not know how many adherents you had, how powerful your philosophy had become. Had I known I would never have written a word but shot myself straight away.

In a few days I will protest Voinovichism, in front of the KQED building in San Francisco.  I will sit on the sidewalk, wait ten minutes, and kill myself by blowing the back of my scull off.

I have written you and your colleagues before.  I first wrote you and your colleagues in 1989 about laser disks in education.  At that time I was warned by the late Rob Robinson that, like Rosencrans and Guildenstern, I would be destroyed by the powerful people who control the country.  “No, this is America!” I bravely said.

Yet time has proven him right and me wrong.  Simply writing letters to the Senate has been my downfall.  I attracted the attention of those powerful people, and as was predicted, they have over the intervening fifteen years used their influence to destroy me.

Senator Hatch heard what Don Imus had done and he thought it a good joke:

“I have heard what you do to some of your listeners.”

---  Senator Hatch, on the Don Imus radio show.

I have previously reported on all of this at my web site:  NewRuskinCollege.com. 

I am driven to my death, by years of harassment, and  oppression.  I could have fled my enemies, changed my name, tried to hide somewhere away from them.  But I chose to stay here amongst them.  I have deliberately spent down my savings so that I would in the end have no choice but death.  I knew that if I had had some way out I would have taken it.  I have backed myself into a corner, surrounded by my enemies, to kill myself.

Why?  I protest my enemies.   I protest your colleague Senator Hatch.  I protest you and your  Voinovichism:  pusillanimity, disloyalty, imbecility.

I wrote some letters to the Senate fifteen years ago and . . .  what? . . .  Oh,  You think I deserve what has happened to me?  I must have done something?  It must be my fault?

Don’t you see?  This is Voinovichism!

Micael Weiner followed me for years, spied on me, organized a burglary, used his influence to interfere with my employment, hectored, harassed and oppressed me ---- but according to Voinovichism, (where there is smoke there must be fire),  it must be my fault!

And Weiner, why isn’t he also a VICTIM?   

(He used to play the sound of empty box cars rolling over a siding, but tried to conceal his childish grasping at VICTIM status by talking about the forlorn sound as if it were the mighty Edinburgh Express chugging out of Waterloo.  More recently he started hysterically shouting that the  “Jews were burned  alive in the ovens during the Holocaust.”  (This being another example of Weiner’s Holocaust denial.  For he denies truth.)  And then just yesterday he has explained that only survivors of the Holocaust are entitled to use that word:  survivor.  If you are still living after a plane crash or shipwreck you are not a survivor according to Weiner.   And Voinovichism stands in perpetual accord with this and any other insanity shouted out by the VICTIM.) 

For we can not expect the VICTIM to reason, to be rational, to merely abide by the truth, to stand up ‘man to man.’  Why sure the VICTIM has to lash out at others that is to be expected.  According to Voinovichism we deserve it?  Those poor VICTIMS.  (Weiner has been agitated by my approaching death and so as expected, he has been returning to wild rants about the Holocaust as self justification for his wrong doing.)

Voinovichism is just this fear of controversy, examination, thought.  Just the fact that I and Mr. Bolton have enemies, especially VICTIM enemies, that bare fact, according to Voinovichism is itself proof and confirmation of . . . of what? . . . why, proof and confirmation of controversy itself.  In Voinovichism the VICTIM is always in the right;  that way it avoids controversy, and can roll over and not be disturbed in its bald slumbers.

Why Don Imus and Michael Weiner and the others harassed me all these years is not the point.  Voinovichism is simply the fact that  I have been targeted, there must be something wrong.  It is not simple minded, for there is no mind there, no thinking at all.  Just an empty headed shallowness. 

No?  Then why did you not contradict your committee chairman Mr. Lugar at the time?  He read his answers to all the allegations.  But you, you coward, did not dare say a word in reply.  Then too, coward, why did you not vote against Mr. Bolton then and there.  Too much of a coward to do it!  That is the reason.  And that too is Voinovichism.

In your world is there nothing that is not Voinovich?  Voinovich bank accounts.  Voinovich homes.  Voinovich children and Voinovich families.  Voinovich is hungry. Or Voinovich is sleepy.  But that Your President assigned Mr. Bolton to State which is notoriously hostile to Republicans, specifically to confront the State Department Bureaucrats in their lair, that in doing so he might create some “controversy” all of this is mysterious to you, well outside your little solar system with Voinovich at its center, Voinovich planets circling the Voinovich sun.  That there should be a whole universe beyond Voinovich, with ideas, and principles, is beyond the comprehension of Voinovichism.     

I am sent to my death by cowards, harassed by dogs;  yes, cowards and dogs: Voinovichites.  I kill myself to   protest you and Senator Hatch.  I protest your Voinovichism. 

cc: Senate

捠 춗瘡

Date:  3-31-05

To:      Robert Frank

Wall Street Journal

robert.frank@wsj.com

From:  Plinio Designori

            Magistor

            New Ruskin College

            PlinioDesignori@NewRuskinCollege.com

Re.:     And it will never stop,  I will destroy Robert Frank’s life . . .  it will never stop.  --- Don Imus

Now that you have started to learn the truth about Don Imus perhaps you can benefit from my experience.  

I invite you to visit NewRuskinCollege.com to learn how Don Imus used his influence to destroy my life.  In a few weeks I will commit suicide in protest of Don Imus and the others who have oppressed me for these last fourteen years.  (Yes, fourteen years.  When he says it will never stop he means that it will never stop.  He will use his influence and power to destroy your life.)  It will not stop.

Please understand that I too want to live.  Even though I have been pushed to the very limits of society, oppressed, driven into poverty, still, in the morning, the sunrise is so beautiful my heart rejoices.  As my time runs out the sun has been racing through the sky. 

Life has resolved itself into a granular or cellular structure.  My alienation is now so complete that I no longer live in a world of isolated individuals, but they themselves have devolved into isolated moments in time.  People appear in a bewildering array of personalities minute by minute, seemingly talking gibberish and no one else seems to notice.

For example it started with me noticing intellectual inconsistencies.  Tax shelters for the rich for example:  The Gallo Brother’s Wine Institute or the Imus ranch.  And of course Imus is so vain he does not see the larger issues.  That anyone should question whether a wasted wizened old man and his young deranged wife should be allowed to shelter millions of dollars in an enterprise that would not exist except for our tax laws,  never once occurs to him.  

Why shouldn’t we allow a degenerate old druggy to decide how our tax dollars are spent?  It is futile to point out that the money thus sheltered means that the rest of the people will now have to pay more.   And who are they?  The ones with the lowest ability to raise their prices;  the highest “propensity to spend.”  But in this idiocy Imus is in no way exceptional. (Senate Finance Chairman Charles E. Grassley (R-Iowa) said:   “In exchange for these very generous tax breaks, charitable assets should be going to those in need. More and more, we're seeing that some people view charities and charitable gifts as a chance to help themselves, not others.  What's going on isn't a pretty picture in the harsh light.”  Acknowledging that “our enforcement presence faded in the late 1990s,” (Boy! Did it!  How about completely sold out and corrupted by the very corporate entities the IRS and the Senate were supposed to be overseeing?  Would you say that Mr. Grassley? )  and "weak governance practices.”)

Just recently “conservatives” who previously condemned “junk science” presented the obviously, and self admitted religiously biased, “doctors” culled from  across the country, as representing “main stream scientific consensus” when they in fact knew that the consensus was just the opposite.  It was an intellectual betrayal.     

One minute they say one thing then in the next breath they contradict themselves . . .  And you may be thinking ‘Well, come on, everyone has their limitations, different perspectives, how do you go from this to the complete disintegration of reason . . . the impossibility of communication . . . utter hopelessness?’

It is said that Ted Kaczynski was the subject of a psychological experiment when he was at Harvard.  They wanted to find out what would happen to the subject if you deliberately denied everything.  They found out.  The survivors of the Soviet Prisons said that the worst of it was that they were housed with the lunatics, and diagnosed as being insane.  After a while, they began to wonder . . . 

But this is what I am trying to tell you, this is my warning, this is what happens to you when they start in on you.   First you will think, “coincidence.”  You will receive a letter from your sister, or a friend, someone you trust absolutely.  And then Imus will repeat a phrase from the letter word for word.  Coincidence.  Then Michael Weiner will start reading from a notebook that you have left at home, or on a car seat, or in a motel room.  Then you editor will hand back a story you have written and tell you to rewrite it.  But then driving home, only an hour later, someone else on the radio will talk about having to “rewrite” and how editors do not know how to tell reporters when they are in trouble and about to be fired.

And right now you think:  paranoia.  Yes!  Exactly!  You will never know!  Don’t you see?  Once they start in on you, your wife?  Can you trust your wife?   Then what? A marriage counselor?   Garrison Keillor?  Rush Limbaugh?  Your employer?  Co-workers, for example?  You go to lunch and when you get back to the office your brief case has been moved, opened?  The secretary nods affirmatively to your co-worker’s questioning glance that you catch just out of the corner of your eye.  They went through my briefcase?  Then Imus reads something you emailed your editor.       

Right now you might think that there are limits.  You may work for a prestigious newspaper, or you are well to do,  you think you have friends, or perhaps you simply think that you live in a nation where the ‘rule of law’ is respected.  Is that what you think?

Or  perhaps you are thinking that your colleagues, friends, family, or even just people generally, your fellow citizens, will not allow you to be targeted in this way.   You may think, ‘This is America,  there is justice.’  What you do not yet understand is that they will all join in.   It will become a kind of game for them.   This is what I meant about the granular structure of their personalities.  They can not be trusted.  They will betray you on questions of economics and medicine?  If they will not accept an EEG or a CAT scan then how can you trust them on such trivial questions such as your oppression, the theft of your papers, etc. ,  etc.?      

Right now you think you can trust them.  There is Truth.  Justice?  You trust in good faith.  Take this letter as a warning:  One, it will not stop, Two, no one will help you.

Over the years many people have commented on my situation.  They wanted me to know that they knew about Don Imus and Michael Weiner,  Mrs. Jack Swanson, Ron Owens, Michael Krasney.  Part of the game for them was that I should know that they knew.  Do you see?  They wanted me to know:

“I have heard what you do to some of your listeners.” --- Senator Hatch, on the Imus Show

“What are you going to do . . . hire an attorney?   I’ve got the best attorneys in the country.” ---  Don Imus

“Drop a card on someone.”  ---  Chris Matthews

“Let’s watch our metaphors.” --- Jim Leher

“I hope you are ‘adjusting’ to your new life of ‘white collar crime’.” --- John McLaughlin

“We better stop, I don’t want to get you into trouble.”  --- Phillip Matier, S. F. Chronicle

“No talent . . . you are lint.’  ---  Bill O’Reilly

“. . . so she can park her car in a red no parking zone.”  --- unidentified Bay Area journalist.

“Like the man said, ‘The mass media is a hydra headed monster.’ --- fat balding reporter for the Sacramento Bee, on KQED

“Is Charles  going to be around for a wile?” because “I want to call back and run a few things by Charles.”  --- David Gregory on Imus, 04-13-04

“His mother . . . she died? . . .” --- Scott Bobro, Farmers Insurance

 “taking baths.”  --- Ron Owens

 “witches”  --- Jim Dunbar and Ed Wygant   

“I love it when conservatives go after one another.”--- Bernie Ward

“Colonial Motel suspect . . .”  --- The San Rafael Police, police radio

“Michael Krasney is on line three for you.”  ----  AAA auto insurance

Barbara Simpson explained that she has no sympathy for people “who keep journals and diaries . . . writing everything down.  And then it gets stolen and made public. So?  And so?  So?  What do you expect?”  --- Barbara Simpson

Last month Rush Limbaugh held up Mrs. Jack Swanson’s arm in a victory pose.  (Mrs. Jack Swanson had tried to have Limbaugh fired from the Kansas City radio station they both worked at in the 1980’s. (She objected to his Femi-NAZIs.  She was a liberal then. )) 

Good luck. 

Her co-panelists were out raged.  What about the “centuries old animosities?”  All this blood and death.  It can not just be thousands of ad hoc decisions.  We need “centuries old animosities.”  Without that then, why, we might be capable of bloody murder. 

The reason I have argued against “objective” values is because of just this:  where are they now?  If you are not practicing the values you claim,  right now, then where are they?  Apart from your actions they do not exist.  If you are not honest now, then honesty does not exist.  People who believe in “objective values” always have the comfort of believing that their values exist even when they are not being practiced.  For them honesty exists even when they are being dishonest.  But then there is always your job to think about.

Is that it Rosie?  Are you afraid of Jack Swanson?   Cross him and tell the truth and you end up doing late night in Cleveland?  Is that what it comes down to?  Dishonesty or Cleveland?  Oh Rosie.  Say it isn’t so, Rosie.  Say it isn’t so.